Assumption is the foundation of human thought and action. It is the skeleton upon which we drape our ideas and behaviors. Like any skeleton, it provides us with necessary structure but also limits our flexibility. To assume is to arrive at a conclusion based on partial or incomplete data. Sometimes, we make assumptions because we lack access to all of the necessary information; often, our assumptions result from a willful desire to see things a certain way. In either scenario we deliberately abandon any further pursuit of knowledge or truth on a particular subject; we assume we know the answer – further study is deemed unnecessary.

Consider mankind’s view of the universe hundreds of years ago; many in the western world believed that the Earth was at the center of all creation. This idea was considered sacred – to speak otherwise was heresy. Complex formulas and models were created to explain the movement of the planets and the heavens under this assumption, models which appeared valid upon observation. Nevertheless, we know today that these models were wrong. Until astronomers such as Copernicus and Galileo came forth to challenge the assumption of Earth-centricity, mankind’s ability to progress in its understanding of space and physics was severely handicapped.

Such historical examples, which often stem from the conflict between science and religion, can lead one to believe (even assume) that the act of assumption is the greatest sin committed by an intelligent mind. Yet, while limiting, assumption is a necessary aspect of human life. There is simply too much information, too many variables to arrive at a comprehensive understanding of the universe. Life itself frequently requires us to make decisions based on incomplete information; to forgo assumption altogether would render us completely inert – unable to act in any capacity.

When you really think about it, all accepted truth is largely based on assumptions of one sort or another. It is impossible to completely verify any of the ideas or principles we cling to as truths. Even the sights and sounds we experience are nothing more than electrical impulses interpreted by our brains (anyone who’s seen The Matrix is familiar with this concept). Ultimately, I would suggest that the only truth a person can claim to know absolutely is the reality of his/her own existence – that in some form another, he/she exists as a conscious entity. Or, to quote the famous philosopher Descartes, “I think, therefore I am.”

Our assumptions constitute acts of religious faith; to accept something as given is to regard it as sacred. To assert that something is sacred is to declare that it is beyond either question or reproach; therefore, it cannot and should not be challenged. It is important to recognize that all human beings are essentially religious creatures. One need not belong to an organized faith to express religious conviction. The importance of human life is a value widely accepted by believer and non-believer alike. When asked to defend this assumption, many will chafe at the question and dismiss its progenitor; often, a strong emotional response is triggered by such a challenge. I can only urge caution when questioning the basic assumptions held by another – you never know what will happen! I confess that it is much easier for me issue such challenges through the electronic medium of the internet.

This leads us to the conflict between intelligence and assumption; while it may be impossible to know a thing with certainty, it seems clear that careful effort or study can help us arrive at a closer approximation of what the truth probably is. Thus a flexible mind, a mind willing to abandon previous assumptions in light of new information, can obtain a clearer perception of truth and rise to higher levels of intelligence than another which is less flexible.

In light of this principle one may assume that the ideal course is to abandon all assumption – take nothing for granted. Nevertheless, this course of action would be highly imprudent; such flexibility could cause one’s perception of reality to become fluid to point of madness. Even if such a paradigm could be adopted without the unfortunate side-effect of insanity, it would still ultimately prove to be self defeating; a person who questions everything in the pursuit of knowledge must eventually question the validity of the very motives and values which compelled him/her to pursue knowledge in the first place!

Ultimately, each of us must decide what assumptions we are willing to make, and hence the knowledge to which we will or will not have access. Such decisions, while limiting in some respects, help to provide definition and clarity to our lives. Each of us must find that balance between flexibility and belief that yields the greatest level of personal satisfaction and peace-of-mind. The willful decision to accept such limitations, and thus restrain our own intelligence, can constitute an act of wisdom when handled with prudence and care. Perhaps it is this wisdom, and not the pursuit of limitless knowledge, that should be the ultimate goal of all conscious, intelligent beings.

Hi, Christopher Wood here!  I’m interested in what you have to say about this article. Whether you agree or disagree, please feel free to leave a comment. If you are reading this article from the main page, you can get to the comments area by clicking on the “Comment” link seen below; otherwise, just type your comment in the box displayed below. You can also use any of the social networking links below to recommend this article to others. I look forward to hearing from you!